Bey ex rel. Sealey v. Bass

642 F. App'x 265
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2189
StatusPublished

This text of 642 F. App'x 265 (Bey ex rel. Sealey v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bey ex rel. Sealey v. Bass, 642 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dayyan Atta Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). In his complaint, Bey sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and other causes of action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Bass, No. 4:15-cv-00091-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bey-ex-rel-sealey-v-bass-ca4-2016.