Bexar County v. Camp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bexar County v. Camp

103 S.W.2d 191, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 383

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 19, 1937

DocketNo. 13535

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.W.2d 191 (Bexar County v. Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bexar County v. Camp, 103 S.W.2d 191, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 383 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

Appellees, Martha L. Camp and her husband, John F. Camp, brought suit against Bexar County, its engineer and the State Highway Commission, appellants, asking the district court of Bexar county to give them a temporary injunction restraining the appellants from cutting down trees growing on the right of way, on -each side of the paved highway, and from digging a drainage ditch along such right of way. The cause of action is predicated upon the fact that appellees executed their deed conveying the property for widening the highway, and they rely upon certain reservations found in the deed.

After a hearing, the trial court denied the prayer in so far as it sought to restrain appellants from digging the drainage ditch, but granted the temporary injunction restraining the cutting of the trees.

We find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, Justice.

Appellees, Martha L. Camp and her husband, John F. Camp, brought suit against Bexar County, its engineer and the State Highway Commission, appellants, asking the district court of Bexar county to give them a temporary injunction restraining the appellants from cutting down trees growing on the right of way, on -each side of the paved highway, and from digging a drainage ditch along such right of way. The cause of action is predicated upon the fact that appellees executed their deed conveying the property for widening the highway, and they rely upon certain reservations found in the deed.

After a hearing, the trial court denied the prayer in so far as it sought to restrain appellants from digging the drainage ditch, but granted the temporary injunction restraining the cutting of the trees.

We find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.W.2d 191, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bexar-county-v-camp-texapp-1937.