Bexar Appraisal District v. Smithson Road Development, LTD
Opinion
Jfourtl) Court of i£>an glntomo,
September 30, 2014
Nos. 04-14-00227-CV, 04-14-00228-CV, 04-14-00229-CV and 04-14-00230-CV
Bexar Appraisal District, Appellant
v.
Sivage Investments, Ltd. and Sivage Community Development, Inc; Bitterblue Inc., Niemann Family Partnership, Linda Wittig, Custodian, et al., and Bitterblue/ Two Creeks Phase Two Ltd.; Smithson Road Development, LTD; and La Cantera Development Corp.
Appellees
Trial Court Case No. 2012-CI-04570
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the records and briefs in these appeals and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the causes are advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 13, 2014, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone, Justice Angelini, and Justice Barnard. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in these appeals in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.
Any party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on September 30, 2014.
herind Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav^Jftejgunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this September 30,2014. /! oF A / /I
4* E./lottie, tie, Cler;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bexar Appraisal District v. Smithson Road Development, LTD (Bexar Appraisal District v. Smithson Road Development, LTD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.