Bewers v. American Home Products Corp.
474 N.E.2d 247, 64 N.Y.2d 630, 485 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4962
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 949) abused its discretion in dismissing the complaints pursuant to CPLR 327.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bewers v. American Home Products Corp., 474 N.E.2d 247, 64 N.Y.2d 630, 485 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4962 (N.Y. 1984).
474 N.E.2d 247 (Bewers v. American Home Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
EPK Brand, Inc. v. Leret
2021 NY Slip Op 03374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Emslie v. Recreative Industries, Inc.
105 A.D.3d 1335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
American BankNote Corp. v. Daniele
45 A.D.3d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Phat Tan Nguyen v. Banque Indosuez
19 A.D.3d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. v. ICICI Bank Ltd.
9 A.D.3d 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Hill v. Citicorp
215 A.D.2d 117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Cesar v. United Technology
148 Misc. 2d 918 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Troni v. Di Milano
129 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Evdokias v. Oppenheimer
123 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)