Bevona v. Albradco, Inc.

173 A.D.2d 419

This text of 173 A.D.2d 419 (Bevona v. Albradco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bevona v. Albradco, Inc., 173 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered April 18, 1990, denying defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and for proceeding in the absence of necessary parties, and order of the same court and [420]*420Judge, entered January 10, 1991, denying defendants’ motion for renewal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, as head of the union which had negotiated the collective bargaining agreements with Bradley Cleaning Contractors, Inc., which operated through two alter-ego corporations, has standing to bring this action under Business Corporation Law § 630 for recovery of wage differentials and unpaid union pension and health funds contributions, even in the absence of the former employees. Furthermore, this representative action is not precluded by General Associations Law § 12. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 630
New York BSC § 630
§ 12
New York GAS § 12

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D.2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevona-v-albradco-inc-nyappdiv-1991.