Bevis v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Bevis v. State

176 So. 833, 27 Ala. App. 592, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 150

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 2, 1937

Docket8 Div. 445.

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 833 (Bevis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bevis v. State, 176 So. 833, 27 Ala. App. 592, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 150 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment in this case contains two-counts. First, charged that the defendants, with two others, not here tried, did unlawfully manufacture whisky, and the second count charged the same parties with being in possession of a still.

The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty,, as charged in the indictment as against both ' defendants, and sentence was properly passed.

We have carefully read and considered the testimony in this case. There-were no prejudicial errors in the admission, of testimony, and there was sufficient evidence tending to prove the guilt of the-parties to justify the verdict.

Charge A refused to the defendants was amply covered in the court’s oral charge.

Charges C and D, being the affirmative charge as to each count, were prop-erly refused.

We find no error in the record and the: judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI