Bevins v. Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-30839·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30839 Conference Calendar __________________

EDDY L. BEVINS; EDWARD F. BEVINS,

Plaintiffs,

EDWARD F. BEVINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GLYNN D. ROBERTS ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-39 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward F. Bevins (Bevins) is the only plaintiff to appeal

the dismissal of this suit. Eddy Bevins did not sign the notice

of appeal and did not respond to the clerk of court's inquiry

whether he wished to appeal. See Mikeska v. Collins, 928 F.2d

126, 126-27 (5th Cir. 1991). The complaint does not allege that

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-30839 -2-

Bevins suffered an injury because of any defendants' conduct;

thus, he lacked standing in the district court and he lacks

standing to appeal. Bevins is not entitled to relief based on an

alleged violation of his adult son's constitutional rights. Hang

On, Inc. v. City of Arlington, 65 F.3d 1248, 1251 (5th Cir.

1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bevins v. Roberts, (5th Cir. 1996).

Bevins v. Roberts (Bevins v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hang On, Inc. v. City of Arlington
65 F.3d 1248 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Mikeska v. Collins
928 F.2d 126 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)