Bevins v. Iowa

282 U.S. 815, 51 S. Ct. 216
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 2, 1931·No. No. 574·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 501. (2) Huntington v. Worthen; Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97, 102.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bevins v. Iowa, 282 U.S. 815, 51 S. Ct. 216 (1931).

282 U.S. 815 (Bevins v. Iowa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. Blankenship
282 S.W.2d 691 (Texas Supreme Court, 1955)