Bevineau-Dickerson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bevineau-Dickerson v. State

419 S.W.3d 905, 2014 WL 296020

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 28, 2014·No. No. ED 99395·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laura Bevineau-Dickerson appeals from the denial of her Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laura Bevineau-Dickerson appeals from the denial of her Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bevineau-Dickerson v. State, 419 S.W.3d 905, 2014 WL 296020 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

419 S.W.3d 905 (Bevineau-Dickerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.