Beville v. McIntosh

41 Miss. 516
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 41 Miss. 516 (Beville v. McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beville v. McIntosh, 41 Miss. 516 (Mich. 1867).

Opinion

Ellett, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe questions in this case are :

1. "Whether a cause can be set down for hearing before a pro eonfesso has been taken against the defendant, he having failed to appear.

2. "Whether a final decree can be passed on a bill to foreclose a mortgage, without a reference to the clerk, or a master, to compute and report the amount due.

"We think that both these questions are settled in the negative by articles 39 and 48 of the Chancery Court act, Rev. Code, 547, which articles are only in affirmance of the long established practice of chancery courts. These rules being now defined by statute, are uniform all over the State, and cannot be departed from or disregarded.

Eor these reasons the decree will be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hambrick v. Jones
64 Miss. 240 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1886)
Mezeix v. McGraw
44 Miss. 100 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
Freeman v. Ledbetter
43 Miss. 165 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Miss. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beville-v-mcintosh-miss-1867.