Bevill v. State

88 S.E. 717, 17 Ga. App. 819, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 960
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 21, 1916
Docket6798
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 717 (Bevill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bevill v. State, 88 S.E. 717, 17 Ga. App. 819, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 960 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. “Upon a trial for the offense of assault with intent to murder, the stabbing being admitted, maliee will be presumed, and the onus of rebutting this presumption is on the defendant.” Hogan v. State, 61 Ga. 43. The circumstances in this case were sufficient to authorize [820]*820the jury to infer, as a matter of fact, that an intent to kill existed. See Adams v. State, 125 Ga. 11 (2-b), 12 (53 S. E. 804).

Decided April 21, 1916. Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Effingham superior court — Judge Sheppard. June 9, 1915. J. Eartridge Smith, for plaintiff in error. W. F. Slater, solicitor-general, contra.

2. The evidence fully authorized the verdict, and the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the usual general grounds, was properly overruled.

■Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hogan v. State
61 Ga. 43 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)
Adams v. State
53 S.E. 804 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 717, 17 Ga. App. 819, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevill-v-state-gactapp-1916.