Bevill v. State
This text of 88 S.E. 717 (Bevill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “Upon a trial for the offense of assault with intent to murder, the stabbing being admitted, maliee will be presumed, and the onus of rebutting this presumption is on the defendant.” Hogan v. State, 61 Ga. 43. The circumstances in this case were sufficient to authorize [820]*820the jury to infer, as a matter of fact, that an intent to kill existed. See Adams v. State, 125 Ga. 11 (2-b), 12 (53 S. E. 804).
2. The evidence fully authorized the verdict, and the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the usual general grounds, was properly overruled.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 717, 17 Ga. App. 819, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevill-v-state-gactapp-1916.