Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.

First Circuit

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.

163 F. App'x 6

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 5, 2006·No. No. 05-1704·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Among other problems, the appellant has no standing to litigate claims that belong to a corporation. Moreover, he has no right to litigate claims in this circuit that are integral to a suit already filed elsewhere, and he makes no showing that the actions are distinct. See, e.g., Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-154, 99 S.Ct. 970, 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979)(describing the deleterious effects of repetitive suits); Congress Credit Corp. v. AJC Intern., Inc., 42 F.3d 686, 689 (1st Cir.1994)(repetitive actions may be dismissed); Gonzalez v. Banco Cent. Corp., 27 F.3d 751, 755-56 (1st Cir.1994).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Among other problems, the appellant has no standing to litigate claims that belong to a corporation. Moreover, he has no right to litigate claims in this circuit that are integral to a suit already filed elsewhere, and he makes no showing that the actions are distinct. See, e.g., Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-154, 99 S.Ct. 970, 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979)(describing the deleterious effects of repetitive suits); Congress Credit Corp. v. AJC Intern., Inc., 42 F.3d 686, 689 (1st Cir.1994)(repetitive actions may be dismissed); Gonzalez v. Banco Cent. Corp., 27 F.3d 751, 755-56 (1st Cir.1994).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co., 163 F. App'x 6 (1st Cir. 2006).

Pincite

163 F. App'x 6 (Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related