Bevill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 29, 2016·No. 06-809·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 06-809V (Not to be published)

************************* * ROBERT T. BEVILL * and JANICE BEVILL, parents and * natural guardians of RCB, a minor, * * Petitioners, * * Filed: January 6, 2016 v. * * Decision on Attorneys’ SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Fees and Costs HUMAN SERVICES * * Respondent. * * *************************

DECISION (ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS) In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,1 I issued a Decision on September 14, 2015. On January 4, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation of fact concerning attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation requests a total payment of $7,267.25, representing attorneys’ fees and costs of $7,107.25, and $250.00 of costs expended by Petitioners. I find that this Petition was filed and pursued in good faith and with a reasonable basis. Thus, an award for fees and costs is appropriate at this time, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amounts seem reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the following attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1): • a lump sum of $7,017.25, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioners and Petitioners’ counsel, Richard Gage, on account of services performed by counsel’s law firm.

1 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2012). • a lump sum of $250.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioners, which represents Petitioners’ own litigation expenses in this case. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED /s/ George L. Hastings, Jr. George L. Hastings, Jr. Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bevill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Bevill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Bevill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b)
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a