Bevill v. Maurizio
This text of Bevill v. Maurizio (Bevill v. Maurizio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-AUG-2019 SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 02:18 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
SPENCER JAMES BEVILL, NANCY LYNN BEVILL, AND BEVILL FAMILY TRUST, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,
vs.
FRANK MAURIZIO; PHIL SCHUTTE; BEVERLY SCHUTTE; BRUCE “SKIP” BLOUGH; MIKE PREISS; CONNIE SCHNITKER; PETE HILL; DARREL BORLING; ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KE NANI KAI, an unincorporated condominium association; THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KE NANI KAI, in their official capacity and personally, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees,
and
MYLES T. YAMAMOTO, Petitioner/Real Party in Interest-Appellant,
SPENCER JAMES BEVILL, NANCY LYNN BEVILL, AND BEVILL FAMILY TRUST, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KE NANI KAI, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIVIL NOS. 08-1-0293 & 12-1-0790) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Real Party in Interest-Appellant Myles T. Yamamoto’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 15, 2019, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 27, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bevill v. Maurizio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevill-v-maurizio-haw-2019.