Bevilacqua v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of 147 A.D.2d 910 (Bevilacqua v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We affirm the award of damages, but find that the court erred in not granting interest on the brokers’ commissions from the date of the commencement of the action on August 27, 1979 (see, CPLR 5001 [a]; Delulio v 320-57 Corp., 99 AD2d 253; Temple Beth Sholom v Fitzsimons & Assocs., 42 AD2d 739). (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Cook, J. — brokerage commissions.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 A.D.2d 910, 538 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevilacqua-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1989.