Beverly's case

1 N.C. 224

Opinion

Jones, J.

A man may enter in the moiety of a manor, [225] and it will not be an entry in the other. But it is otherwise with parceners.

Doderidge, J.

Before partition, one parcener has dimidium manerii afterwards medietatem. For dimidium is of a thing before the division, as between tenants in common and joint tenants. But medietas is the half part divided; and separated, and this distinction is taken in the commentaries. Yet as to the privileges of the manor, it is one manor, and not the half of a manor, after partition. It may be well alledged in such a case, that the entry is in the moiety of the manor. The court held that the exception was vain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beverly's case, 1 N.C. 224 (circtnc 1793).

1 N.C. 224 (Beverly's case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.