Beverly's case

1 N.C. 224

This text of 1 N.C. 224 (Beverly's case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beverly's case, 1 N.C. 224 (circtnc 1793).

Opinion

Jones, J.

A man may enter in the moiety of a manor, [225]*225and it will not be an entry in the other. But it is otherwise with parceners.

Doderidge, J.

Before partition, one parcener has dimidium manerii afterwards medietatem. For dimidium is of a thing before the division, as between tenants in common and joint tenants. But medietas is the half part divided; and separated, and this distinction is taken in the commentaries. Yet as to the privileges of the manor, it is one manor, and not the half of a manor, after partition. It may be well alledged in such a case, that the entry is in the moiety of the manor. The court held that the exception was vain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beverlys-case-circtnc-1793.