Beverly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beverly v. State

107 So. 3d 519, 2013 WL 599119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2013

DocketNo. 1D12-5819

StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 3d 519 (Beverly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beverly v. State, 107 So. 3d 519, 2013 WL 599119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 7, 2012, the Court has determined that its jurisdiction was not timely invoked. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed with the court until December 5, 2012. Contrary to appellant’s assertion, his attempt to file a notice of appeal by serving it on opposing counsel did not invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. [520]*5209.110(b). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 7, 2012, the Court has determined that its jurisdiction was not timely invoked. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed with the court until December 5, 2012. Contrary to appellant’s assertion, his attempt to file a notice of appeal by serving it on opposing counsel did not invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. [520]*5209.110(b). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 3d 519, 2013 WL 599119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beverly-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.