Beverly v. Gumren

260 So. 3d 1193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 2019
DocketNo. 3D18-808
StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 3d 1193 (Beverly v. Gumren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beverly v. Gumren, 260 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (providing in pertinent part: "The judgment sought must be rendered immediately if the pleadings and summary judgment evidence on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law"); Bende v. Furr & Cohen, P.A., 941 So.2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (affirming summary judgment where appellant failed to file affidavits or other sworn statements in opposition to appellee's motion for summary judgment, and appellee's motion and sworn proof in support thereof conclusively established the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to a judgment as a matter of law); Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Yurko
446 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Bende v. Furr & Cohen, P.A.
941 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 3d 1193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beverly-v-gumren-fladistctapp-2019.