Beverly v. Crowe

150 S.E. 436, 40 Ga. App. 538, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1929·No. 19938; 19940; 19941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The order sustaining the demurrer to the petition and allowing a stated time in which to amend it, to which no exception was taken, fixed the law of the case; and, the plaintiff’s amendment having failed to meet the objections raised .by the demurrer (the amendment in all substantial respects being merely a reiteration of the allegations ' of the original petition), the trial court did not err in dismissing the petition. Baker v. Atlanta, 22 Ga. App. 483 (96 S. E. 332), and cit.; Grossman v. Atlanta, 25 Ga. App. 161 (102 S. E. 847).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant cases, the judge of'the superior court in each case properly overruled the certiorari. Judgments affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beverly v. Crowe, 150 S.E. 436, 40 Ga. App. 538, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 631 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

150 S.E. 436 (Beverly v. Crowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines v. Merlin
176 S.E. 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)