Beverly B. Wilson v. Joseph Patrick Clancy

940 F.2d 654, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23578, 1991 WL 132401
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 1991
Docket90-2502
StatusUnpublished

This text of 940 F.2d 654 (Beverly B. Wilson v. Joseph Patrick Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beverly B. Wilson v. Joseph Patrick Clancy, 940 F.2d 654, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23578, 1991 WL 132401 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

940 F.2d 654
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Beverly B. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Patrick CLANCY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-2502.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 9, 1991.
Decided July 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-89-3072-S)

William James Murphy, Murphy & McDaniel, Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

Charles Martinez, Eccleston & Wolf, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md., 747 F.Supp. 1154.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD B. KELLAM, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Beverly B. Wilson brought this legal malpractice action against Joseph Patrick Clancy, the lawyer who drafted the will of Wilson's late uncle, Dr. Hurney. The suit claimed that Clancy negligently failed to advise Dr. Hurney of the need to take certain legal steps in order to insure that his testamentary intent could be carried out. The district court granted summary judgment to Clancy, and Wilson appeals.

After carefully reviewing the record and hearing argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its opinion. Wilson v. Clancy, 747 F.Supp. 1154 (D.Md.1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Clancy
747 F. Supp. 1154 (D. Maryland, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 F.2d 654, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23578, 1991 WL 132401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beverly-b-wilson-v-joseph-patrick-clancy-ca4-1991.