Bevels v. State
This text of 23 So. 2d 156 (Bevels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us on appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Jackson County, Florida. The transcript of record was filed here on the 23rd day of March, 1945. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants.
The Attorney General has filed his motion praying that the judgment against the defendants be affirmed on the record.
The appellants filed in the lower court notice of grounds upon which they rely for reversal of the judgment. There is one ground specified reading as follows:
“The court erred in denying the defendant’s motion as a whole for a new trial.”
The defendants’ motion for a new trial was upon the following grounds, to-wit:
“1. The verdict is contrary to the evidence.
“2. The verdict is contrary to the law.
“3. The verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence.
“4. The evidence does not justify a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree against these defendants, or either of them.”
The verdict was:
“We the jury find the defendants guilty of first degree murder as charged. Recommend mercy of court. So say we all.” Signed “L. E. Tidwell, Foreman.”
We have carefully examined the record and find no reversible error reflected therein. Therefore, judgment is affirmed as to each and every of said defendants, appellants here.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 So. 2d 156, 156 Fla. 159, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevels-v-state-fla-1945.