Bevan v. Bevan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bevan v. Bevan

366 So. 2d 869, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1979

DocketNo. 77-2549

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 So. 2d 869 (Bevan v. Bevan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bevan v. Bevan, 366 So. 2d 869, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment finding the appellant-husband in arrears as to previously established obligations to the appellee-wife. In one of its findings the trial court concluded that the husband was in arrearage for unpaid medical expenses in the amount of $879.63. The husband contends and this court agrees that the evidence was uncontradicted that the husband had paid $390.00 of that amount directly to the physicians involved. The appellant has failed to demonstrate that the numerous other findings of the trial court are in error. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and remanded with directions that it be reduced by the sum of $390.00.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment finding the appellant-husband in arrears as to previously established obligations to the appellee-wife. In one of its findings the trial court concluded that the husband was in arrearage for unpaid medical expenses in the amount of $879.63. The husband contends and this court agrees that the evidence was uncontradicted that the husband had paid $390.00 of that amount directly to the physicians involved. The appellant has failed to demonstrate that the numerous other findings of the trial court are in error. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and remanded with directions that it be reduced by the sum of $390.00.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 So. 2d 869, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevan-v-bevan-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack