Bevan J. Wade v. Jonathan Paul Wade
This text of Bevan J. Wade v. Jonathan Paul Wade (Bevan J. Wade v. Jonathan Paul Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
BEVAN J. WADE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D17-0341
JONATHAN PAUL WADE,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed September 20, 2017.
An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge.
Bevan J. Wade, pro se, Appellant.
Jonathan Paul Wade, pro se, Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution, we affirm without
comment as to all issues except the requirement that the former husband maintain
life insurance to secure his support obligations. The trial court orally pronounced
this requirement, but it was not included in the written judgment as the law
requires. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 151 So. 3d 27, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement). Therefore, we reverse and
remand for the trial court to modify the final judgment to include the orally-
pronounced life insurance requirement.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with
instructions.
RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bevan J. Wade v. Jonathan Paul Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bevan-j-wade-v-jonathan-paul-wade-fladistctapp-2017.