Beutel v. Beutel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beutel v. Beutel

159 A.D.2d 1029, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 1029 (Beutel v. Beutel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beutel v. Beutel, 159 A.D.2d 1029, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for extension of time to file records and briefs granted in accordance with the following memorandum: The parties are directed to stipulate to the record no later than March 15, 1990 or, in the event the parties are unable to do so, appellant is directed to move for an order settling the record no later than April 1, 1990. Defendant’s attorney’s contention that he no longer is the attorney of record in this action is without merit. Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for extension of time to file records and briefs granted in accordance with the following memorandum: The parties are directed to stipulate to the record no later than March 15, 1990 or, in the event the parties are unable to do so, appellant is directed to move for an order settling the record no later than April 1, 1990. Defendant’s attorney’s contention that he no longer is the attorney of record in this action is without merit. Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 1029, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beutel-v-beutel-nyappdiv-1990.