Beulah Rose v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services

946 F.2d 886, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28930, 1991 WL 206068
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1991
Docket91-1086
StatusUnpublished

This text of 946 F.2d 886 (Beulah Rose v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beulah Rose v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 946 F.2d 886, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28930, 1991 WL 206068 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

946 F.2d 886

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Beulah ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-1086.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1991.
Decided Oct. 15, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-39-B)

Beulah Rose, appellant pro se.

Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Va.; Stephen M. Walker, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

W.D.Va., 763 F.Supp. 167.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Beulah Rose appeals from the district court's order affirming the secretary's decision to deny her deceased husband's application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, as amended. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rose v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, CA-89-39-B (W.D.Va. Mar. 11, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose ex rel. Rose v. Sullivan
763 F. Supp. 167 (W.D. Virginia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 F.2d 886, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28930, 1991 WL 206068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beulah-rose-v-louis-w-sullivan-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-ca4-1991.