Beulah Clifton v. Island Creek Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17208, 1995 WL 230249
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 1995
Docket94-1691
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 320 (Beulah Clifton v. Island Creek Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beulah Clifton v. Island Creek Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17208, 1995 WL 230249 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 320
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Beulah CLIFTON, Petitioner,
v.
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 94-1691.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 4, 1995.
Decided: April 19, 1995.

Beulah Clifton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, WV; Christian P. Barber, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Clifton v. Island Creek Coal Co., No. 92-1644-BLA (Ben. Rev. Bd. Apr. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17208, 1995 WL 230249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beulah-clifton-v-island-creek-coal-company-directo-ca4-1995.