Beucler v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Beucler v. Lloyd

859 A.2d 567, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 378

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketSC 17260

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 859 A.2d 567 (Beucler v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beucler v. Lloyd, 859 A.2d 567, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 378 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights [914]*914under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights [914]*914under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

859 A.2d 567, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beucler-v-lloyd-conn-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack