Beucler v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Beucler v. Lloyd

859 A.2d 567, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 378

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 2004·No. SC 17260·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights [914]*914under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights [914]*914under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.

Beucler v. Lloyd, 859 A.2d 567, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 378 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

859 A.2d 567 (Beucler v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related