Beu v. Beu

194 So. 2d 60, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1967·No. No. 66-386·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the correctness of a final decree entered in a declaratory decree action. The primary relief sought by the appellee was a determination of her status or relationship with one Gustav Beu, deceased; i. e., whether or not at the time of his death the appellee was his wife and if so, incidental thereto, the assignment of dower in a certain parcel of real property. The appellee prevailed and the final decree determining her to he the lawful widow of Gustav Beu was entered and dower was allotted.

We have examined the errors assigned and argued by the appellant, and find them to be without merit and affirm. See and compare: Coleman v. Davis, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 81; Martz v. Riskamm, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 83; In Re Coffey’s Estate, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 568.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beu v. Beu, 194 So. 2d 60, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

194 So. 2d 60 (Beu v. Beu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Davis
106 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Martz v. Riskamm
144 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
In re Estate of Coffey
171 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)