Betz v. Trainer Wortham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2007·No. 05-15704·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HEIDI BETZ,  No. 05-15704 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-03231-SI TRAINER WORTHAM & COMPANY,  Northern District INC.; DAVID P. COMO; FIRST of California, REPUBLIC BANK, a Nevada San Francisco corporation; ROBERT VILE, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.  Filed September 14, 2007

Before: John T. Noonan, Ronald M. Gould, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. The opin- ion in the above-captioned matter filed on May 11, 2007, and published at 486 F.3d 590, is WITHDRAWN. A modified opinion shall be filed and substituted.

The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from entry of the modified opinion to file petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc in the above-captioned matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12409 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betz v. Trainer Wortham, (9th Cir. 2007).

Betz v. Trainer Wortham (Betz v. Trainer Wortham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related