Betz v. State
This text of 712 So. 2d 778 (Betz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Betz’ motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court properly sentenced Betz to consecutive sentences, which combined together fell within the sentencing guidelines range. See Branam v. State, 554 So.2d 512 (Fla.1990). Further, Betz’ claim that there was no factual basis for this plea with regard to counts four and six1 is refuted by the attached excerpt of the probable cause affidavit in this case, which reflects Betz confessed to the commission of these offenses after receiving Miranda2 warnings.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
712 So. 2d 778, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6508, 1998 WL 288387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betz-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.