Betz v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Betz v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC

9 A.3d 1134, 607 Pa. 620, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2746

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 1, 2010·No. 278 WAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*621 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in reversing the trial court’s decision to exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs experts in this friction-product asbestos case?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*621 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in reversing the trial court’s decision to exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs experts in this friction-product asbestos case?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Betz v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC, 9 A.3d 1134, 607 Pa. 620, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2746 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

9 A.3d 1134 (Betz v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related