Betz v. Industrial Commission

41 N.E.2d 701, 139 Ohio St. 624, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 624, 23 Ohio Op. 118, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 570
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 6, 1942
Docket28943
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 41 N.E.2d 701 (Betz v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betz v. Industrial Commission, 41 N.E.2d 701, 139 Ohio St. 624, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 624, 23 Ohio Op. 118, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 570 (Ohio 1942).

Opinion

By the Court.

Plaintiff filed in the Common Pleas Court a petition on appeal from a disallowance by the Industrial Commission of his claim for workmen’s compensation.

Defendant filed a demurrer, which was sustained and plaintiff was granted leave to plead further.

Plaintiff filed an amended petition and a demurrer thereto was sustained. The concluding portions of the entry recite, “it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the demurrer of the defendant to the plaintiff’s amended petition be and is hereby sustained. Exceptions to the plaintiff.” The record does not contain an entry either granting further leave to plead or entering judgment for the defendant.

Plaintiff prosecuted an appeal on questions of law to the Court of Appeals. The record does not disclose a motion to dismiss for want of a final order. The Court of Appeals entered judgment reversing the action of the Court of Common Pleas in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition.

After a motion to certify the record was allowed and the case was submitted upon its merits, attention of counsel was directed to the fact that the record presented to this court does not contain a final order in the *625 Court of Common Pleas. That omission was conceded by counsel.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to vacate its judgment of reversal and to remand the cause to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St., 199.

Judgment reversed and cause rema/nded.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Bettman, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willhoit v. Flowers
240 N.E.2d 889 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1968)
Caputo v. Keller
208 N.E.2d 755 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1965)
Trunk v. Hertz Corp.
200 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1964)
Schindler v. Standard Oil Co.
165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 76 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1956)
Collins v. Yellow Cab Co.
157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 311 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1952)
Bell v. Bell
100 N.E.2d 88 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.E.2d 701, 139 Ohio St. 624, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 624, 23 Ohio Op. 118, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betz-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1942.