Betul Oney v. Mustafa Oney
This text of Betul Oney v. Mustafa Oney (Betul Oney v. Mustafa Oney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 7, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00477-CV ——————————— BETUL ONEY, Appellant V. MUSTAFA ONEY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 507th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2022-02021
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Betul Oney, has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal,” stating that
“she d[oes] not want to pursue her appeal.” No other party has filed a notice appeal,
and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Further, although the
motion’s certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with appellee, Mustafa Oney, regarding the relief requested in the motion, more than ten
days have passed, and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.
10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).
Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Betul Oney v. Mustafa Oney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betul-oney-v-mustafa-oney-texapp-2023.