Betty Porter v. Jennifer Welsh

71 F. App'x 612
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 2003
Docket03-1222
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 F. App'x 612 (Betty Porter v. Jennifer Welsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betty Porter v. Jennifer Welsh, 71 F. App'x 612 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Betty R. Porter appeals the decision of the District Court 1 to grant summary judgment to the defendants in her diversity medical malpractice action after the District Court determined that Porter had failed to meet the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 145.682 (West 1998) (certification *613 of expert review). Having reviewed de novo the Court’s interpretation and application of § 145.682, see Reimer v. City of Crookston, 326 F.3d 957, 961 (8th Cir. 2003), we agree with the District Court that expert testimony was required and that a psychologist was not qualified to render expert opinions in this case. Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Porter’s motion to supplement the record.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. Welsh
540 U.S. 1079 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 F. App'x 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-porter-v-jennifer-welsh-ca8-2003.