Betty Ortiz and David M. Wethy v. Marcus B. Leinart and Leinart Law Firm
This text of Betty Ortiz and David M. Wethy v. Marcus B. Leinart and Leinart Law Firm (Betty Ortiz and David M. Wethy v. Marcus B. Leinart and Leinart Law Firm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00381-CV ___________________________
BETTY ORTIZ AND DAVID M. WETHY, Appellants
V.
MARCUS B. LEINART AND LEINART LAW FIRM, Appellees
On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 067-313108-19
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants Betty Ortiz and David M. Wethy, appearing pro se, attempt to
appeal from the trial court’s “Order Granting Defendant’s Traditional Motion for
Summary Judgment and Final Judgment Dismissing Case with Prejudice,” signed
July 22, 2020. Appellants filed a motion for new trial on August 21, 2020, making
their notice of appeal due October 20, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1).
Appellants, however, did not file their notice of appeal until November 2, 2020.
On December 1, 2020, we sent a letter to Appellants stating our concern that
we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because their notice of appeal was not timely
filed. We informed Appellants that unless they, or any party desiring to continue the
appeal, filed a response by December 11, 2020, showing a reasonable explanation for
the late filing of the notice of appeal, the appeal could be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Appellants did not file a response.
The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a
timely-filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex.
1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because Appellants’ notice
of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
2 /s/ Dana Womack
Dana Womack Justice
Delivered: January 7, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Betty Ortiz and David M. Wethy v. Marcus B. Leinart and Leinart Law Firm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-ortiz-and-david-m-wethy-v-marcus-b-leinart-and-leinart-law-firm-texapp-2021.