BETTY M. MORTENSON v. NANY O. MORTENSON-VIVAS
This text of BETTY M. MORTENSON v. NANY O. MORTENSON-VIVAS (BETTY M. MORTENSON v. NANY O. MORTENSON-VIVAS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 9, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1308 Lower Tribunal No. 20-3165 ________________
Betty M. Mortenson, Appellant,
vs.
Nany O. Mortenson-Vivas, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
Buchbinder & Elegant, P.A., and Harris J. Buchbinder, for appellant.
Luis E. Barreto & Assoc. P.A., and Luis E. Barreto; Billbrough & Marks, P.A., and G. Bart Billbrough, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. Stat. § 744.331(6)(b) (2020) (“A guardian may not
be appointed if the court finds there is an alternative to guardianship which
will sufficiently address the problems of the incapacitated person.”); Adelman
v. Elfenbein, 174 So. 3d 516, 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“Upon a finding of
incapacity, the court is required to either appoint a guardian or find that there
is an alternative to guardianship. If there is an alternative to guardianship,
the court is prohibited from appointing a guardian.”) (emphasis in original)
(citations omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BETTY M. MORTENSON v. NANY O. MORTENSON-VIVAS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-m-mortenson-v-nany-o-mortenson-vivas-fladistctapp-2021.