Home/Fifth Circuit/Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee

Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee

998 F.2d 253, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20202, 1993 WL 293307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee. Read the opinion of the Court — 986 F.2d 1478 →
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 5, 1993·No. 91-4606·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee, 998 F.2d 253, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20202, 1993 WL 293307 (5th Cir. 1993).

998 F.2d 253 (Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee
986 F.2d 1478 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Edgar Rolando Palomo
998 F.2d 253 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)