Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New York
This text of Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New York (Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 185 Betty L. Kimmel, Respondent, v. State of New York et al., Appellants. -------------------------------- Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin, Interested Party-Respondent.
Mitchell J. Banas, Jr., for appellants. A. Vincent Buzard, for respondent and interested party- respondent. Empire Justice Center et al.; Legal Services of Central New York, amici curiae.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Reargument ordered and case set down for argument at a future session of the Court. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Garcia concur. Judges Pigott and Fahey took no part.
Decided November 22, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-l-kimmel-v-state-of-new-york-ny-2016.