Betty Jean Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

307 F.3d 921, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11354, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9993, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20667, 2002 WL 31158051
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2002·No. 99-17383·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In light of the answer given to the question certified to the Supreme Court of California, Myers v. Phillip Morris Cos., 239 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir.2001), this case is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with Myers v. Philip Morris Cos., 28 Cal.4th 828, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 40, 50 P.3d 751 (2002) and Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 28 Cal.4th 856, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 61, 50 P.3d 769 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betty Jean Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 307 F.3d 921, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11354, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9993, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20667, 2002 WL 31158051 (9th Cir. 2002).

307 F.3d 921 (Betty Jean Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related