Betty Janey, Widow of Warren Janey v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22036, 1990 WL 203963
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1990
Docket90-2722
StatusUnpublished

This text of 920 F.2d 926 (Betty Janey, Widow of Warren Janey v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betty Janey, Widow of Warren Janey v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22036, 1990 WL 203963 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

920 F.2d 926
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Betty JANEY, widow of Warren Janey, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

No. 90-2722.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 17, 1990.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (87-2128-BLA)

Betty Janey, petitioner pro se.

Michael John Denney, Eileen Mary McCarthy, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Ben. Rev. Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Betty Janey seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Janey v. Director, OWCP, No. 87-2128-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. Apr. 25, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22036, 1990 WL 203963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-janey-widow-of-warren-janey-v-director-offic-ca4-1990.