Betty "G" v. Joseph "H"

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Betty "G" v. Joseph "H"

34 A.D.2d 860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 860 (Betty "G" v. Joseph "H") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betty "G" v. Joseph "H", 34 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the respondent from an order of filiation and support of the Family Court, Rensselaer County, entered March 12, 1969, and cross-appeal by the petitioner. As noted by the trial court in its decision, the record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the finding of paternity. On both appeals, the record supports the award of support in the amount of $25 per week. We note that Family Court has continuing jurisdiction over the amount of support. Furthér, the amount awarded for counsel fees to petitioner was neither excessive nor inadequate. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the respondent from an order of filiation and support of the Family Court, Rensselaer County, entered March 12, 1969, and cross-appeal by the petitioner. As noted by the trial court in its decision, the record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the finding of paternity. On both appeals, the record supports the award of support in the amount of $25 per week. We note that Family Court has continuing jurisdiction over the amount of support. Furthér, the amount awarded for counsel fees to petitioner was neither excessive nor inadequate. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-g-v-joseph-h-nyappdiv-1970.