Betty Furgan v. Harvest Hospitalities

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2022
Docket22-1723
StatusUnpublished

This text of Betty Furgan v. Harvest Hospitalities (Betty Furgan v. Harvest Hospitalities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betty Furgan v. Harvest Hospitalities, (4th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1723 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1723

BETTY M. FURGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARVEST HOSPITALITIES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00585-AWA-LRL)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty M. Furgan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1723 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Betty M. Furgan appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion to

dismiss her amended complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in

the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Furgan’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of

the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited

to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey
775 F.3d 170 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Betty Furgan v. Harvest Hospitalities, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-furgan-v-harvest-hospitalities-ca4-2022.