Betty Bendall, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee v. Dalkon Shield Claimants' Committee, Amicus Curiae
This text of 871 F.2d 465 (Betty Bendall, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee v. Dalkon Shield Claimants' Committee, Amicus Curiae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se letter, which this Court has construed as a motion for reconsideration of the order denying the petition for rehearing,
IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for reconsideration is granted, and the petition for rehearing in this case is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond, is hereby reversed.
Entered at the direction of Judge Russell, with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Chapman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
871 F.2d 465, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4768, 1989 WL 34902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-bendall-claimant-appellant-v-ah-robins-company-incorporated-ca4-1989.