Betty Bendall, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee v. Dalkon Shield Claimants' Committee, Amicus Curiae

871 F.2d 465, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4768, 1989 WL 34902
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 1989·No. 88-1571·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se letter, which this Court has construed as a motion for reconsideration of the order denying the petition for rehearing,

IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for reconsideration is granted, and the petition for rehearing in this case is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond, is hereby reversed.

Entered at the direction of Judge Russell, with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Chapman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betty Bendall, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee v. Dalkon Shield Claimants' Committee, Amicus Curiae, 871 F.2d 465, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4768, 1989 WL 34902 (4th Cir. 1989).

871 F.2d 465 (Betty Bendall, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee v. Dalkon Shield Claimants' Committee, Amicus Curiae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Indian Wells Estates, Inc.
96 F.3d 1451 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)