Betty Ann Newby v. Sheria Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Ralph Newby, Jr., Dan Moser, Individually and as Trustee for Moser and Stubblefield Investments Moser Investments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2004
Docket07-03-00547-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Betty Ann Newby v. Sheria Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Ralph Newby, Jr., Dan Moser, Individually and as Trustee for Moser and Stubblefield Investments Moser Investments (Betty Ann Newby v. Sheria Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Ralph Newby, Jr., Dan Moser, Individually and as Trustee for Moser and Stubblefield Investments Moser Investments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betty Ann Newby v. Sheria Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Ralph Newby, Jr., Dan Moser, Individually and as Trustee for Moser and Stubblefield Investments Moser Investments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0547-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


FEBRUARY 13, 2004



______________________________


BETTY ANN NEWBY, APPELLANT


V.


SHERIA EVANS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE
ESTATE OF GEORGE RALPH NEWBY, JR., DECEASED; DAN MOSER
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR MOSER AND STUBBLEFIELD
INVESTMENTS; MOSER INVESTMENTS, APPELLEES


_________________________________


FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;


NO. 35,142; HONORABLE JACK YOUNG, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 30, 2003, the clerk of this court received a copy of a Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of appellant Betty Ann Newby. By letter dated January 5, 2004, the clerk advised appellant that a filing fee had not been received, see Tex. R. App. P. 5, nor had a docketing statement been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. The clerk's letter likewise advised that no further action would be taken on the appeal by this Court until a filing fee had been paid and that failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

The filing fee was not paid. By letter dated January 22, 2004, the clerk advised counsel for appellant that the filing fee had still not been paid, and that unless the filing fee was received on or before February 2, 2004, the appeal would be subject to dismissal.

The filing fee has not been paid. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.



Phil Johnson

Chief Justice





intLim m:val="subSup"/>

                                                              NO. 07-10-0264-CR

NO. 07-10-0265-CR

                                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                          FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                  AT AMARILLO

                                                                      PANEL B

                                                            NOVEMBER 10, 2010

                                                ______________________________

                                                         ANTHONY CALDERON,

Appellant

                                                                             v.

                                                          THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

                                             _________________________________

               FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. ONE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

                 NOS. 2007-445080, 2009-456184; HON. STUART MESSER, PRESIDING

                                               _______________________________

                                                           On Motion to Dismiss

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Anthony Calderon, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeals because he no longer desires to prosecute them.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motions to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeals.  Having dismissed the appeals at appellant=s request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will issue forthwith.

Do not publish.                                                            Per Curiam                          

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Betty Ann Newby v. Sheria Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Ralph Newby, Jr., Dan Moser, Individually and as Trustee for Moser and Stubblefield Investments Moser Investments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-ann-newby-v-sheria-evans-individually-and-as-administratrix-of-the-texapp-2004.