Betty A. Rios v. State
This text of Betty A. Rios v. State (Betty A. Rios v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-09-0259-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 7, 2010 ______________________________
BETTY A. RIOS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. ONE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2007-446,768; HONORABLE RUSTY LADD, JUDGE _______________________________
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Appellant, Betty A. Rios, filed a notice of appeal from her conviction for driving while
intoxicated and sentence of three days incarceration and $2,000 fine. The sentence was
suspended and appellant was placed on community supervision for a period of 12 months.
The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk’s record on September 22,
2009. The trial court reporter’s record was received and filed on October 27, 2009. Thus,
appellant’s brief was due on or before November 26, 2009. On December 8, 2009, this Court notified appellant that her brief was past due and
that, if her brief was not filed by December 18, 2009, her appeal would be abated and
remanded to the trial court. As of the date of this order, appellant has failed to file her
brief.
Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See
TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to
immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal,
whether appellant is indigent and, if not indigent, whether counsel for appellant has
abandoned the appeal; (3) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether
appellant’s present counsel should be replaced; and (4) what orders, if any, should be
entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s
appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal or, if appellant desires to
prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued. If the trial court
determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the court should
cause the Clerk of this Court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas
identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney.
The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file
appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations and cause them to
be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be
transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4) have a record of the
proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the
2 supplemental clerk’s record or the supplemental reporter’s record; and (5) cause the
records of the proceedings to be sent to this Court. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). In the
absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk’s
record, supplemental reporter’s record, and any additional proceeding records, including
any orders, findings, conclusions, and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be
received by the Clerk of this Court not later than February 8, 2010.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Betty A. Rios v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betty-a-rios-v-state-texapp-2010.