Betts v. Shields

Ohio Circuit Courts

Betts v. Shields

18 Ohio C.C. 875

DecidedOctober 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 875 (Betts v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betts v. Shields, 18 Ohio C.C. 875 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

GIFFEN, J.

The motion of plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the defendant, [876]*876Wm. Hartley Pugh, administrator, in each of the above cases, is sustained for the reason that the only issue made in the petition as against him is for the recovery of money only; and his answer, which merely denies that his intestate received the money, does not change the issue.

Ellis B. Gregg, for Plaintiff. Wm. Hartley Pugh, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIFFEN, J.

The motion of plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the defendant, [876]*876Wm. Hartley Pugh, administrator, in each of the above cases, is sustained for the reason that the only issue made in the petition as against him is for the recovery of money only; and his answer, which merely denies that his intestate received the money, does not change the issue.

Ellis B. Gregg, for Plaintiff. Wm. Hartley Pugh, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ohio C.C. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betts-v-shields-ohiocirct-1899.