Betts v. Shields
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 341
This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 341 (Betts v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Betts v. Shields, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 341 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).
Opinion
The motion of plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the defendant, Win. Hartley Pugh, administrator, in each of the above cases, is sustained for the reason that the only issue made in the petition as against him is for the recovery of money only; and his answer, which merely denies that his intestate received the money, does not change the issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betts-v-shields-ohcircthamilton-1899.