Betts v. Farrell
This text of 13 Iowa 572 (Betts v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Trespass for entering and breaking the close of plaintiff. Trial before a magistrate, and judgment for plaintiff — appeal to the District Court, and second judgment for plaintiff — no exceptions whatever taken to any ruling of the court.
In this court, the defendant assigns for error, for the first time, that the plaintiff was permitted to amend his petition in the District Court — -claiming in argument that such amendment had the effect to change the cause of action. A comparison of the two petitions shows that such is not the fact. They are substantially the same, the last being a little more specific than the first. Besides, no objection was made to such amendment at the time — the defendant went to trial on the issues as made. He cannot raise the objection for the first time in this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Iowa 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betts-v-farrell-iowa-1862.