Bettina Equities Co. v. State of New York Executive Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bettina Equities Co. v. State of New York Executive Department

9 A.D.3d 296, 780 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A.D.3d 296 (Bettina Equities Co. v. State of New York Executive Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bettina Equities Co. v. State of New York Executive Department, 9 A.D.3d 296, 780 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered March 7, 2003, which denied petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction of a pending administrative proceeding, dismissed this proceeding to annul respondent’s interim order, dated March 21, 2002, which denied petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the racial discrimination complaint against it, and directed respondent to reschedule the previously scheduled hearing on the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The interim order of the Administrative Law Judge, converting petitioner’s motion to dismiss the racial discrimination complaint of petitioner’s former tenant on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds to a motion for summary judgment and denying it, was not a final determination within the meaning of CFLR 7801 (1). Nor does it fall within any of the three exceptions to either the rule of finality or the requirement of exhaustion of administrative remedies: futility of the administrative remedy; irreparable harm in the absence of prompt judicial intervention; or a claim of unconstitutional action. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered March 7, 2003, which denied petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction of a pending administrative proceeding, dismissed this proceeding to annul respondent’s interim order, dated March 21, 2002, which denied petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the racial discrimination complaint against it, and directed respondent to reschedule the previously scheduled hearing on the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The interim order of the Administrative Law Judge, converting petitioner’s motion to dismiss the racial discrimination complaint of petitioner’s former tenant on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds to a motion for summary judgment and denying it, was not a final determination within the meaning of CFLR 7801 (1). Nor does it fall within any of the three exceptions to either the rule of finality or the requirement of exhaustion of administrative remedies: futility of the administrative remedy; irreparable harm in the absence of prompt judicial intervention; or a claim of unconstitutional action. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.3d 296, 780 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bettina-equities-co-v-state-of-new-york-executive-department-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack