Better Plastics, Inc. v. Kissimmee Utility Authority
This text of 511 So. 2d 402 (Better Plastics, Inc. v. Kissimmee Utility Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee, an electric service public utility, owes appellant, a customer, a refund for overcharges. The customer claims it is entitled to prejudgment interest on the overcharge refund under section 687.01, Florida Statutes and Argonaut Insurance Company v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985). The utility claims that as a regulated public utility it can lawfully do only what is authorized by the Public Service Commission, which, by Florida Administrative Code Rule 25-6.106(2), has authorized overcharge refunds but has not authorized the payment of interest on overcharge refunds.
In the absence of a clear and lawful limitation, a regulated public utility has all rights granted by, and duties imposed by, general law and, specifically, has the legal obligation to pay prejudgment interest on overcharge refunds.
We certify as a question of great public interest:
Is a regulated public utility in Florida liable to customers for prejudgment interest on overcharge refunds?
Final summary judgment in favor of the utility is reversed and the case remanded for entry of summary judgment for the customer.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 So. 2d 402, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1834, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9607, 1987 WL 1364515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/better-plastics-inc-v-kissimmee-utility-authority-fladistctapp-1987.